|
animalet (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This game is not a 1995 game, its earlier, I remember playing it on a 486 PC a lot of time ago. Can't know which time exactly.
BigBoss1982 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I know Cyberia and Crusader very very good cuz I bought them in that era of the beginning of ''cd-rom''. Yes , they r amazing but Hell is also amazing 4 me and I don't see it exactly same as u :) but I respect yours theory but all in all I don't agree w with u. Hell has got many drop of fraps but design was/is still fuckin kickin !!!!
int3rl0per (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
...and of course I mis-typed 'grammar' in my last post. How ironic.
int3rl0per (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I find your spelling and gramar appalling - it took me a good while to decipher your message. No, I don't think graphics is everything, the playability and plot are the defining factors of a game. That said, a good game can be brought down by bad graphics.This is one of the games where a few months of extra design and rendering time would have paid off well. Check out Crusader or Cyberia for an idea of how pre-rendered graphics of the time were expected to look.
BigBoss1982 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I can't agree with u ... does graphics is the most important thing in whole games 4 u ??? Whatever In this case Hell had and still has an amazing graphics. Amazing plot ... and atmosphere !!!
Quakepunk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This BAND is impossible to find, let alone the song.
int3rl0per (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Also, Crusader: No Remorse. Way better graphics, all pre-rendered.
int3rl0per (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Dear God, that sucked. Even for 1995 graphics - Syndicate had a better intro, and Descent had better graphics in-game. ;ESlow, jerky, badly lit and animated.. And they must've been on crack when choosing those colors.
nighthawkxXxX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i like this
keyotikdragon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is ass |
